Boardman, who was nominated to the federal bench by former President Joe Biden, had previously issued a temporary restraining order. The preliminary injunction offers longer-term relief blocking DOGE access as the case plays out.
The judge found the Trump administration likely violated the law. She said the government failed to adequately explain why DOGE needed access to “millions of records” to perform its duties.Also read: Federal judge blocks Trump administration from banning transgender people from military service
She also said the Trump administration can still carry out the president’s agenda without receiving unfettered access to a trove of personal data on federal employees and people with student loans and government benefits. That includes their income and asset information, Social Security numbers, birth dates, home addresses and marital and citizenship status.
“They trusted the federal government to safeguard their information. That public trust likely has been breached,” Boardman wrote in her opinion.
The lawsuit accused the Trump administration of handing over sensitive data for reasons beyond its intended use, violating the Privacy Act. Instead of carrying out the functions of the federal student loan programme, the lawsuit says, DOGE has been accessing loan data “for purposes of destroying” the Education Department.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order last week to dismantle the department, saying that student loans will be handled by the Small Business Administration and programs involving students with disabilities will be shifted to the Department of Health and Human Services.
Also read: US judge finds Musk’s USAID cuts likely unconstitutional, blocks him from making more cuts
His administration says DOGE is targeting waste across the federal government by addressing alleged fraud and upgrading technology.
One of the nation’s largest teachers unions, the American Federation of Teachers, says it represents 1.8 million workers in education, healthcare and government. Also joining the suit were six people with sensitive information stored in federal systems, including military veterans who received federal student loans and other federal benefit payments.
The suit also was backed by the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers.
The injunction, which could be challenged on appeal, is limited to protecting the personal information of the individual plaintiffs and members of the groups. “No matter how important or urgent the President’s DOGE agenda may be, federal agencies must execute it in accordance with the law,” Boardman wrote. “That likely did not happen in this case.”
Also read: Mass Federal Layoffs Under Trump and Musk: These services are most affected by US government job cuts
