However, WazirX is allegedly using unhacked assets to compensate victims of the hack, which he sees as a violation of fundamental rights and a mismanagement of user funds.
In contrast, he pointed to CoinDCX’s recent hack, where investor assets were restored within 24 hours—demonstrating that a swift and transparent resolution is possible.
Digital payments expert Sanjay Saxena raised concerns over the lack of clarity in WazirX’s resolution process. He noted unresolved questions regarding ownership and asset rights, particularly since the process does not align with conventional creditor resolution mechanisms like those seen under India’s NCLT framework.He stressed that crypto is not a mutual fund and needs a dedicated regulatory framework to protect investor rights.
IndiaTech.org President and CEO Rameesh Kailasam echoed the need for a structured approach to digital asset resolution. He emphasised the importance of governance, standards, and legal procedures—especially as other jurisdictions begin implementing Digital Asset Resolution Packages (DARPs).
According to Kailasam, investors are not only chasing high returns but also seeking the security and transparency of a mature, well-regulated market.
Also Read | No ban, but oversight: Government clarifies stand on offshore crypto platforms in Parliament